Sure, there would be the "have nots" who fail to emerge from the rubble.
The main hope for the Have nots is a Republican tendency to overplay their hand.
In part, his comments reveal the gap between the haves and have nots here in Pakistan.
For instance run through John's Gospel, and pick out the negatives on His lips, the "nots."
Then "self-control" receives the emphasis of an eight-fold repetition of "nots."
Notice the “nots” and “buts,” indicating the change from the negative to the positive statement.
The original distinction between the "haves" and the "have nots" has persisted throughout history and is with us to-day.
Possibly there is exactly the right number of "nots" in the Bible, but they have been wrongly distributed.
In those days, they always put two nots together when they meant to speak strongly.
There is a busy time under the surface of those "nots" and "alls."
negative particle, mid-13c., unstressed variant of noht, naht "in no way" (see naught). As an interjection to negate what was said before or reveal it as sarcasm, it is first attested 1900; popularized 1989 by "Wayne's World" sketches on "Saturday Night Live" TV show. To not know X from Y (one's ass from one's elbow, shit from Shinola, etc.) was a construction first attested c.1930. Double negative construction not un- was derided by Orwell, but is persistent and ancient in English, popular with Milton and the Anglo-Saxon poets.
What has just been stated is emphatically not true: Millions of animals in experimental labs die annually. Shock value? NOT!/ Hooray for Pat Buchanan, not!/ Dan Quayle has already filmed a commercial declaring Murphy Brown his favorite show ...''not'' (1990s+)