It will of course be a relatum in relations which also implicate other factors of nature.
The entity is so disclosed as a relatum in the complex which is nature.
Thus a situation is an event which is a relatum in the relation of situation.
The ‘it’ for thought is essentially a relatum for sense-awareness.
Again, suppose the definiend to be a relatum: the correlate thereof must of course be declared in the definition.
Caput autem a Septimuleio, amico Gracchi, ad Opimium relatum auro repensum fertur.
Accordingly we are now considering mind as a relatum in sense-awareness.
But in discerning an event we are also aware of its significance as a relatum in the structure of events.
Yet, if the correlate is thus described in the definition of a relatum, the definition cannot be considered good or sufficient.
The soul is the relatum, and is unintelligible and void of sense without its correlatum.