Dictionary.com
Thesaurus.com

dissenting opinion

American  

noun

Law.
  1. (in appellate courts) an opinion filed by a judge who disagrees with the majority decision of a case.


Usage

What is a dissenting opinion? When one or more judges on a panel disagree with a decision made by the majority in a court ruling, they can file an official disagreement known as a dissenting opinion.In the United States and other jurisdictions, courts that decide appeals to the decisions of lower courts are called appellate courts (in the U.S., the Supreme Court is the top appellate court). In such courts, rulings are made by a panel of judges, with a majority vote deciding each case. Any judge who doesn’t vote with the majority can file a dissenting opinion (or simply dissent) explaining why they disagree.In a general sense, a dissenting opinion is simply an opinion that does not agree with others—especially one that goes against a mainstream opinion. But the term is most often used in its specific legal sense. Dissenting opinions are part of the legal tradition in many countries, including the U.S., the U.K., Canada, and Ireland. Dissenting opinions are very often discussed in relation to the U.S. Supreme Court, since such opinions can have a significant impact on future court rulings.

Example Sentences

Examples are provided to illustrate real-world usage of words in context. Any opinions expressed do not reflect the views of Dictionary.com.

Roberts has been silent on the subject since he wrote a dissenting opinion in the case.

From Los Angeles Times

“Especially in a city of refugees like Miami, a lot of people have escaped dictatorships and strongmen who’ve shut down dissenting opinions,” said Costantini in an interview Monday.

From Los Angeles Times

He said he had expected a sleepy affair, where he would be one of the few people with a dissenting opinion.

From Los Angeles Times

The Supreme Court ruled without dissenting opinions that the law did not violate the US Constitution's First Amendment protection against government abridgment of free speech.

From BBC

In a dissenting opinion, Justice Joyce Kennard rejected the assertion that there wasn’t good reason to question Cox’s conviction.

From Los Angeles Times