false equivalence

American  

[fawls i-kwiv-uh-luhns] / ˈfɔls ɪˈkwɪv ə ləns /

noun

1. a logical fallacy in which one assumes or asserts that two things are the same or equal when, while alike in some ways, they are not sufficiently similar to be considered equivalent.

---

Etymology

Origin of false equivalence

First recorded in 1880–85

Example Sentences

“How refreshing it is to hear clear and morally sound statements that do not create a false equivalence or call for addressing ‘both sides,’” Mr. Smotrich said.

From New York Times

This false equivalence does both journalists and readers a great disservice.

From Slate

His advice for other editors: “I think the false equivalence has got to go, because that’s not what this is anymore.”

From Salon

This isn’t a false equivalence.

From Salon

The result too often is false equivalence.

From Los Angeles Times