Dictionary.com
Thesaurus.com

intertextuality

American  
[in-ter-teks-choo-al-i-tee] / ˌɪn tərˌtɛks tʃuˈæl ɪ ti /

noun

  1. the interrelationship between texts, especially works of literature; the way that similar or related texts influence, reflect, or differ from each other.

    the intertextuality between two novels with the same setting.


Usage

What does intertextuality mean? Intertextuality refers to the way that works of art, especially literature, are related and influence each other. Text, in this context, most often refers to a work of literature, like a book or poem, but it can be any creative work, such as a film, song, painting, or speech. Intertextuality often involves things like the similarities and differences between two pieces, but it can also cover a broad range of relationships between different works. Intertextuality is primarily used in literary and cultural criticism and analysis. Example: In this class, we’ll examine the intertextuality between Hamlet and The Lion King.

Other Word Forms

  • intertextual adjective
  • intertextually adverb

Etymology

Origin of intertextuality

1970–75; < French intertextualité < inter- inter- + textuel textual + -ité -ity

Example Sentences

Examples are provided to illustrate real-world usage of words in context. Any opinions expressed do not reflect the views of Dictionary.com.

It also features intertextuality, narratorial irony, recursiveness, and heteroglossia.

From The New Yorker • Apr. 19, 2019

William's interpretation shows how his assistant's dream was a dream of books, a dream of dreams, of a past and future inextricably mixed in imagination--a triumph of intertextuality.

From Los Angeles Times • Feb. 20, 2016

The video is a model of pop-culture intertextuality that makes a virtue out of its wide-ranging sampling, and much of its fun came from peeling its thickly layered influences.

From New York Times • Nov. 20, 2014

"Your dissertation on Joycean intertextuality is sick, bro."

From Slate • Nov. 20, 2013

Those four films are absolutely uncompromising in their distended structures, their irrealism, their bitterness, their intertextuality, their self-questioning.

From The Guardian • Aug. 17, 2012