meritocracy

American  

[mer-i-tok-ruh-see] / ˌmɛr ɪˈtɒk rə si /

noun

plural

meritocracies

1. an elite group of people whose progress is based on ability and talent rather than on class, privilege, or wealth.

2. a system in which such persons are rewarded and advanced.

   The dean believes the educational system should be a meritocracy.

3. leadership by able and talented persons.

---

meritocracy British  

/ ˌmɛrɪtəˈkrætɪk, ˌmɛrɪˈtɒkrəsɪ /

noun

1. rule by persons chosen not because of birth or wealth, but for their superior talents or intellect

2. the persons constituting such a group

3. a social system formed on such a basis

---

meritocracy Cultural  

1. A government or society in which citizens who display superior achievement are rewarded with positions of leadership. In a meritocracy, all citizens have the opportunity to be recognized and advanced in proportion to their abilities and accomplishments. The ideal of meritocracy has become controversial because of its association with the use of tests of intellectual ability, such as the Scholastic Aptitude Test, to regulate admissions to elite colleges and universities. Many contend that an individual's performance on these tests reflects his or her social class and family environment more than ability.

---

Other Word Forms

• meritocrat noun
• meritocratic adjective

Etymology

Origin of meritocracy

First recorded in 1955–60; merit + -o- + -cracy

Example Sentences

To maintain a meritocracy, a business must hold on to key employees, says Pullman & Comley, a law firm based in Connecticut.

From MarketWatch

"It's not a meritocracy; it's a mirror-tocracy," the worker said, adding: "The commissions go to people who are similar to those in charge. They want to see what they think reflects them."

From BBC

At the same time, we must defend a genuine meritocracy of ideas.

From The Wall Street Journal

He chose to favor biology over meritocracy and anointed Commodus as his heir when the boy was only 5 years old.

From The Wall Street Journal

That isn’t the end of meritocracy—it is what meritocracy looks like at the top.

From The Wall Street Journal